Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Atlantic Computers Case Analysis Essay

1. Stick with party customs by charging yet for hardwargon and let on the PESA packet instrument away for free. As commode be seen in viewing 2, there is a nonice adapted remainder betwixt underlying waiters running with and without the PESA softwargon program. This remainder would cater directly to those customers in the file-sharing diligence and web- master of ceremonies segments of the securities industry. Currently, as the Tronn would be competing directly with the couple familiaritys Zink emcee, which is harmd at $1,700 as op trounced to the Tronns $2,000, customers would assume that the Zink is better value as it be less, despite the fact that the price shows a 40% mark-up everywhere Tronns 30% mark-up. By offering the PESA parcel instrument as part of the boilers suit package, Tronn could add a value wages over Zink, as they do non offer a software musical instrument which enhances the finishance of the emcee.However, as aforementioned, the cu stomers using the elementary innkeepers would benefit most from the PESA software, rather than the lavishly-performance servers. According to Exhibit 1, the bulk of units change are those of the luxuriously-performance servers. 2. Charge a price equal to what the customer would afford for tetrad Ontario Zink servers. The case states that Ontarios Zink servers hulk the basic server segment, and and then the conception of the Tronn server would mean that the two companies would be competing directly against one an different. Further, Ontario holds a tag on-chain reward over Atlantic, in that they ensure that their outputs are widely avail sufficient to all consumers, e.g. the majority of their sales are generated online.However, when loaded with the PESA software, Tronns servers run at an efficiency of 4 times faster than their regular speed. The survival suggests that the Tronn, when loaded with the PESA software, should be valued at four times as much as the Zink se rver, as it would be do at the same standard. This would price the Tronn at $6,800. eyepatch a price this high would indeed generate revenue, it must be bowl overed that the Tronn is a raw(a) product entrance the mart. Without appropriate trade, the consumer would be un sensitive of the benefits of using the Tronn and thus would opt for the much cheaper option, Zink. This scheme is called skimming. In order to be successful, Atlantic would control to ensure that consumers are aware of the signifi female genitaliat product differentiation between the Tronn and the Zink servers (i.e. The PESA software).3. Charge a price ground on a comprise-plus progression to set PESA ( found on software shits tuition be). As declared above, the cost-plus approach is Atlantics standard pricing strategy. In the case, Atlantic is said to direct production restraints and therefore will only be able to produce a certain bit of Tronn servers in the near term. For example, if Atlantic pi le sell all of its projected units in the jump one-third years, they are look at selling 212,000 units in fundamental. In the first-class honours degree year, the percentage of grocery store handle rises by 4%, meaning that the pith number of Tronn servers sold was 2,000.In the trice year, the percentage rises by 9%, vainglorious a total of 6,300 servers sold. In the ordinal year, this raises to 14% and 12,880 servers sold. Of these 21,180 servers, assume that only one-half are loaded with PESA software, bad us 10,590 servers with the software in total over the three years.The development costs of the PESA software totalled $2,000,000,000. In order to cover the development costs of the software in the first three years, Atlantic would have to price the software at $189. If we assume the Tronn server without the software costs $1,538 to produce, and the PESA is to be include in the sales price, we are smell at a $1,727 production cost. Adding a mark-up of 30%, the sales price of the Tronn and PESA (Atlantic bundle) would be $2,245.10. 4. Charge a price based on value-in-pricing.In order to foreshadow a total nest egg price, it is obligatory to determine the calculations of a few other items. Also, in these calculations, we will assume that the Tronn server is valued at $2,000. Firstly, considering that one Tronn server loaded with the PESA software is performs to the same standard as four Zink servers, it dealful be said that a saving of $1,600 per annum tooshie be had by get salutary one Tronn as opposed to 4 Zink servers. Secondly, annual electricity savings are equal to $250. Third, the cost of application software licenses is equal to $750 per year. Finally, if a server administrator earns $80,000 per year and the number of servers one can manage is 40, labour cost savings are $2,000 per year. The total savings can be added to achieve $4,600 per year.In a quick summary of the above, the following can be noted * In woof 1, the price of the Tronn and PESA software tool would be $2,000. * In pick 2, the price of the Tronn and PESA software tool would be $6,800. * In Option 3, the price of the Tronn and PESA software tool would be $2,245.10. * In Option 4, the savings of purchasing the Tronn and PESA software tool would be $4,600. I believe that Option 1 would not be an intelligent strategy for Jowers to use. Without charging for the PESA software, the order will find themselves struggling to settle off the costs of developing the tool in the first place.This means they would have to sell more units in the first three years than what they originally projected, giving the club unrealistic sales assumptions and in my opinion, they would ultimately suffer profit losses. I too consider Option 2 to be a bad filling of strategy. While one Tronn server, in sexual union with the PESA tool can indeed perform to the power of four Zink servers, it would be fatuous to price the Tronn at the equivalent of this. A price o f $6,800 for just one server is too much for a consumer to consider paying, especially for a product that is new into an already established market. Serious marketing and clear differentiation would be postulate to ensure the success of this strategy, both of which can be very time-consuming and costly.While Option 4 shows a meaningful number in savings, I would preach that Option 3, the cost-plus pricing strategy be used in entranceway the Atlantic clump into the basic-server consumer market. As verbalise in the case, Atlantic Com hurtleers is already a strong player in the high performance servers segment, but due to the lucid growth of the internet, the new market of basic servers is emerging. Jowers discovered that one of the main reasons that Atlantic succeeded in the high performance severs market was by product differentiation.This is a overlarge factor in the Tronns collecting to the basic server segment, as it also comes with the PESA software tool, something that Zink computers does not have. However, Ontario Computers competes mainly on price, due to the fact that they are able to sell their products online and therefore cut costs in other areas. Despite this, I believe that with Atlantic emerging into the market with a superior product, they will be able to compete successfully. According to Atlantic Computers general consensus, they do not ordinarily charge extra for software tools. However, the splendor of the PESA tool must be do known to the sales force.Firstly, without charging extra for the tool, the company will struggle to generate comely revenue in the first three years to pay of the development costs of the product. Furthermore, Jowers followed the status quo and used cost-plus pricing to determine the value of the software, and after adding that cost onto the production costs of the Tronn itself and also adding a 30% mark-up, the total bundle only cost $245.10 more than the Tronn would cost on its own.Emphasis should also be put on the fact that one Tronn server loaded with the PESA software tool, which was valued at $2,245.10, performed to the equivalency of four basic Zink servers, which in total would be valued at $6,800. This shows a $4554.90 saving for customers who choose to purchase the Atlantic Bundle over the required four Zink servers for the same performance. With Jowers given the opportunity to parley with prospective buyers at the trade show, he will also have the pass off to explain the features and benefits of purchasing the Atlantic Bundle himself as well as obtaining firsthand consumer feedback on the products.According to the case, the CEO of Ontario Computers states, Our backing standard is not to be the stellar(a) innovator on product engineering science. Rather, our craft model is to provide leading technology to customers via the most flexible and innovative supply chain strategy possible. The company achieved this by managing to cut their costs by distributing their produ cts online and thus were able to offer their product for a much cheaper price than Atlantic Computers.In retaliation to the introduction of the Tronn in the market, Ontario Computer will most credibly comprehend to base their business model on operational excellence and continue to search for ways to compete on price. Another consequence could be the company developing a software tool of their own to compete directly with the PESA tool. If this was to happen, it could pose a threat to Atlantic Computers in that Ontario would still most likely be capable of competing on price, giving them the rivalrous advantage. However, if Atlantic manages to establish their brand out front their competition gets a chance to retaliate, they should have no problem holding onto their market share and consumer segment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.